Post by xyz3500 on Feb 22, 2024 0:34:14 GMT -5
The Attorney General of the Union and the Comptroller General of the Union signed this Tuesday (12/11) a leniency agreement with the former Engevix Group, now Nova Participações SA Under the agreement, the company must pay R$526.3 million for damage to public coffers and illicit enrichment in fraudulent contracts involving federal public resources. The construction company, investigated in the "lava jet" operation, must make payment by January. The bodies defined that the amounts will be fully allocated to the Union and the injured entities. Of the total, R$315.84 million corresponds to the refund of amounts paid as bribes, while R$105 million refers to illicit enrichment, R$42.08 million refers to the administrative fine and R$53.36 million to the fine civil.
Also according to the agreement, the Federal Audit Court may determine the reimbursement of any losses found in the future. The agreement establishes that the company must improve the company's current integrity program to prevent illegal acts and provide more transparency to the business. For lawyers Guilherme Magaldi and Arthur Guedes , partners at Piquet, Magaldi and Guedes Advogados, who represent Nova Engevix in the leniency agreement, " the company will have its Israel Mobile Number List Administrative Liability Process at the CGU (PAR) archived, it will once again be able to contract with Petrobras and the public civil actions filed by the AGU will be archived". "The company wins with the implementation of new conduct, the Public Power wins with the recovery of assets, and society wins with a scenario of improved relations between public and private", they add.
And this is being inflated by the press, which is difficult”, says Simone Schereiber. “To what extent are these demonstrations legitimate and to what extent are they undue because they prevent the Judiciary and institutions from functioning as they should?” Federal judge Otávio Peixoto Júnior , from the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region (SP and MS), expresses total disapproval of the operation: “Due to the way it was conducted, I never had sympathy for the so-called operation and in the current scenario of revelations the feeling is one of repulsion . The main issue is impartiality, which in my opinion was not observed in more than one process, notably that of the former president [Lula], which in addition to disrespecting the rights of the people affected also damages the image of the Judiciary.
Also according to the agreement, the Federal Audit Court may determine the reimbursement of any losses found in the future. The agreement establishes that the company must improve the company's current integrity program to prevent illegal acts and provide more transparency to the business. For lawyers Guilherme Magaldi and Arthur Guedes , partners at Piquet, Magaldi and Guedes Advogados, who represent Nova Engevix in the leniency agreement, " the company will have its Israel Mobile Number List Administrative Liability Process at the CGU (PAR) archived, it will once again be able to contract with Petrobras and the public civil actions filed by the AGU will be archived". "The company wins with the implementation of new conduct, the Public Power wins with the recovery of assets, and society wins with a scenario of improved relations between public and private", they add.
And this is being inflated by the press, which is difficult”, says Simone Schereiber. “To what extent are these demonstrations legitimate and to what extent are they undue because they prevent the Judiciary and institutions from functioning as they should?” Federal judge Otávio Peixoto Júnior , from the Federal Regional Court of the 3rd Region (SP and MS), expresses total disapproval of the operation: “Due to the way it was conducted, I never had sympathy for the so-called operation and in the current scenario of revelations the feeling is one of repulsion . The main issue is impartiality, which in my opinion was not observed in more than one process, notably that of the former president [Lula], which in addition to disrespecting the rights of the people affected also damages the image of the Judiciary.